Autonomous Software Engineering

Agents that act, not just answer.

Most software waits for input. We build agents that plan, execute and integrate directly with your existing systems — with clear boundaries on what they're allowed to do.

Best starting point

One well-defined, repeated workflow — not an open-ended "automate everything" brief.

First moveMap the permission boundaries
Works best withAn owner who reviews the audit trail
Built on

From "chat" to "action".

Standard LLM

Isolated (chat box)
Read-only mode
Waits for prompts
No memory
VS

SISI agent

Integrated (APIs, databases)
Read/write access, scoped deliberately
Proactive triggers
Long-term memory
How we keep it accountable

More capability means more guardrails, not fewer.

Giving a system read/write access to real tools is a real decision. Every agent we build carries these by default, not as an add-on.

Explicit permission boundaries

Each agent gets the narrowest scope of access that lets it do its job — nothing broader by default.

Human checkpoints on real consequences

Anything with a financial, legal or customer-facing outcome routes through a person before it's final.

Full audit trail

Every decision and action an agent takes is logged and reviewable, not a black box.

Rollback built in

Actions an agent takes can be traced back and reversed — this isn't a one-way door.

Industry applications

Agents in action

Retail agents

Orchestrate inventory, support and sales across channels.

  • Inventory sync: monitors stock levels and triggers reorder APIs when low.
  • Shopper assistant: personalized guidance based on purchase history (CRM lookups).
  • Returns automation: validates return policies and issues shipping labels instantly.

Want to see one working?

We can walk through a live agent connected to real systems (Stripe, HubSpot, Jira) on a short call — more useful than a canned demo video.

Request a walkthrough
Engineering stack

Our tooling

Illustrative, not fixed — the agent tooling landscape moves fast, and we choose the right tool for the job rather than a single stack for every build.

Orchestration
LangChainFramework
LangGraphState
HaystackPipeline
Runtime
AutoGen (MS)Multi-agent
CrewAITask force
Assistants APIOpenAI
Memory
PineconeVector DB
QdrantSelf-host
RedisCache
Best fit

Agents work best when the workflow is real, bounded and worth governing properly.

Strong fit

  • The workflow is repeated and well understoodA clear, recurring process is far easier to automate safely than a vague ambition.
  • Someone owns the outcomeA named person reviews what the agent does and can adjust its boundaries.
  • You already have foundational AI automation in placeAgents extend a working automation and data foundation — see AI Automation if that's not there yet.

Not the first move

  • The goal is a one-off demoWe're most useful when an agent needs to survive daily use, not just impress once.
  • No one has reviewed the access it would needThat review is part of the engagement, not a prerequisite — but it has to happen before launch.
  • The workflow itself is still undefinedAn agent will only automate the confusion — Discovery, PoC & MVP is a better starting point.
Next step

Ready to define your first agentic workflow?